Jump to content

Jellico73

Members+
  • Posts

    776
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Jellico73

  1. 35 minutes ago, Sunstrikuuu said:

    I find it's a big problem specifically with recruitment and performance analysts, and with sports scientists and physios (as always, talking solely about in prior versions here.  Have not bought '23, will not buy '23).  There are lots of generated staff who are recruitment analysts (20 aptitude for the role), and have good stats to be recruitment analysts, but are for whatever reason only willing to consider jobs as performance analysts, which they're much worse at, and vice versa.   Those two job pairs specifically have been annoying.

    Probably something going on under the hood with 22 then.  I remember having similar issues in 22, but no more than what I am encountering in 23.  

  2. 56 minutes ago, kepz said:

    This has been an issue for a while, but can you please fix the staff search function? If I am looking for recruitment analysts, I shouldn't have to waste a negotiation with someone who, despite being in the results for 'recruitment analyst', is only interested in being a scout or some other job that isn't the one I'm searching for. I even add the extra search layer of 'preferred job > is', but that doesn't matter. Really annoying and a massive waste of time. 

    Set your search up with 'Staff Role' and 'Preferred Job' as part of the criteria.  Set them both to the job you are looking for, fixes 90% of the problems with this IMO
    image.png.62c5e474f0bc78ef8d1604b98217bff1.png

    The only time I find when this doesn't work out well is with Directors.  Technical Directors want to be GM's, that sort of thing.  Coaching, Scouting, Analyst and most of the other staff position jobs there are way less issues than just searching with staff role or preferred job selected

  3. 53 minutes ago, _Ben_ said:

    After a bit of public perception here. Trying to create a new way to show attributes on screens that don't have the room for the five circles like I've used elsewhere. I, so far, have these options:

    OPTION 1: Pizza

    dbe8cea137d6bf5722321556bf8a39cf.png

    OPTION 2: Pies

    a3941caec6ad31b5fb670a1153a15391.png

    OPTION 3: Re-used Morale

    2950352bdb93c400f1ee6bed48bccc30.png

    OPTION 4: Size dependent

    e5c2046fc816d7921740aa0e0d9ee60f.png

    --

    So, what do you like and why? Also - what don't you like?

    Thanks!

    1,3 , 2, 4 in that order.

    I am much more a visually oriented type of person, so anything that tells me the information I am looking for in such a way that I don't have to second guess what I am looking at when I am wearing the wrong set of bifocals works best for me.

    Jellico

  4. Couple of thing's I've noticed. 


    Players Report in the Squad Planner (Report->Comparison) Base Skin:
    https://gyazo.com/3df644b2c77f2ca0abbd491e1d62f721

    And in the Musterman Skin:
    https://gyazo.com/581aabd15eeae319cb9f824c85008997

    the attribute categories are missing?

    Coaching Attributes and role comparison:
    https://gyazo.com/9985c56ef962e69f4e4f21d324be3ec0

    Isn't this supposed to look like the player comparison screen or I am remembering wrong?

    Jellico

  5. I had to do a reinstall of FM, and started up a new save.  I've loaded the Numerical Version of the skin, added the Blue alternative settings, and changed my attribute colors.

    When I look at my attributes view I see this:
    image.thumb.png.b9a06fbb473920b08ed145e49df81f1c.png

     

    But when I look at a player, in this case Gianluca Colla, I see this:

    image.thumb.png.961e3959cf13e7d7ff965677382c072b.png

    The attribute colors aren't matching up?

    Granted I have yet to move forward a day, but I don't think that would be the issue here...

    Appreciate the help!

    Jellico

     

  6. 18 minutes ago, Flohrinho said:

    I usually only set up players for the development list, putting all my settings in. These settings get completely ignored. Only if I then get into manually offering him to clubs the settings get followed, that surely isn't how it should be, right? I mean, otherwise, what is the development list for if those settings get ignored?

    Right, I am saying it's possible there's a conflict between what you are putting in and what the settings in the Responsibilities are.  Either way I'd still send something in, its definitely worth looking at closer.

  7. 2 hours ago, Flohrinho said:

    Is it a known bug that the loan manager keeps ignoring my development list settings? I clearly instructed the player only to be loaned out if the agreed playing time is a "regular starter", but my loan manager keeps accepting loans with the status "fringe player". Really annoying.

    Only after I manually offer the player out for loan with "regular starter" demand the loan manager seems to accept the right loans and reject those who offer less playing time.

    It could be a conflict within the settings causing an issue.

    If you go to 'Responsibilities' then 'Offer to Clubs', what do you have selected there as the criteria for outgoing loans?  If the Loan Manager is in charge of finding development loans, he may be trying to follow the 'rules' set there despite the Dev Center settings.  I could have sworn at one point if you set the requirements in responsibilities they would autopopulate in the development list, but I could be (and probably am) wrong.  I'd submit a bug report either way.  

  8. 1 minute ago, rdbayly said:

    Yeah I googled it after I posted and read this. The issue is twofold with both the bugged trophy presentation and the Serie A rules page failing to mention anything of this playoff. I have no desire to continue the save and will step away from the game now. The most unpolished and disappointing release in many, many years.    

    At least submit a bug report first.  I wouldn't assume anyone else has...

  9. 13 hours ago, rdbayly said:

    Can anyone shed some light on this turn of events? I just won Serie A on the last day of the season and saw my team lift the trophy. I return to my inbox and see this:

    image.thumb.png.6c3191aafa7caebf1798fd9b60a875fa.png

    League table:

    image.thumb.png.d503531626ff3958c7f54721d8a6d3d6.png

    Sorting rules:

    image.thumb.png.b98281a7b7804e573550bc75f1b64ed8.png

    My record against Lazio:

    image.thumb.png.caf977c7bddb88d769b9f84d92eda542.png

    Is it because our goal difference is the same? Either way, why did I just witness the trophy presentation??

    It's the rules actually, from the wiki for Serie A.

    Tiebreaking[edit]

    If after all 38 games there are two teams tied on points for first place, the team that wins the scudetto is decided by a single-legged play-off game of 90 minutes and penalties (no extra time), to be held at a neutral venue.[30] If more than two teams are tied for one of those spots then the two teams to play in the match is decided by a mini table between the teams involved. For a tie in any other position the deciding tie-breakers are as follows:

    1. Head-to-head points
    2. Goal difference of head-to-head games
    3. Goal difference overall
    4. Higher number of goals scored
    5. Play-off game at a neutral venue if relevant to decide European spot or relegation; otherwise by draw[31]

    And this is the article they cite, its a new rule from this year apparently:

    https://www.cbssports.com/soccer/news/serie-a-introduce-scudetto-tiebreaker-one-match-playoff-to-determine-champion-if-teams-tied-at-seasons-end/

    It's a bug in the the details on the league rules page, they are incorrect in not stating the difference between a tie for 1st and a tie for other positions, but the rules within the game were applied correctly.  

    Jellico

  10. 13 hours ago, ScottishFM said:

    Anyone else noticing an incredible high amount of yellow cards? 4 seasons in to a Plymouth save and at least twice a season we're being fined for not controlling our players. We're probably averaging 3-4 yellows per game, my right back had 7 yellow cards after only 12 games in to the league campaign.

    I am playing a gegenpress system but I don't have "get stuck in" on or fully maxed high press, so I don't understand why we're getting so many yellows. Never seemed to have this issue in previous editions. Spoke to a few friends who have noticed the same with their saves too.

    Wondering if it is just a coincidence or whether others are finding this? I personally find it way over the top though.

    I've always had a high amount of yellow cards, no matter what FM I play.  Doesn;t matter that the season I took over a team the year before they had ~50 Yellows, when I coach they get 80+, and thats without me diving into tackles or getting stuck in.  And after I leave the club goes back down to ~50 yellows.  I just chalk it up to my players wanting to play hard for me and move on.

  11. 58 minutes ago, Wavelberry said:

    OOooookkkaayyyy....

     

    5f0e3e5622bd43279d28378eacd5ca52.png0bd237b3882a5ee37fe5fbf5db6cfadc.png

     

    f5aad921d570670247c07b901511e33b.png

     

    Guess the best defence in the league is just a bit too disappointing.

    It's the same as when fans complain you won 1-0 when they were expecting you to win 4-0, and expect some of those draws to be wins and some of those defeats to be draws as a result.  In my save PSG won the League by 13 points, I am pretty sure they had fans complaining it wasn't by more and even more fans wanting Gaultier fired because he lost 1 game all season.

  12. 2 hours ago, BethFM said:

    Scouting Africa is certainly throwing up some potential gems! 

    The additional bonus is that many (all?) of the African Countries count as EU for France, so there aren't any Non EU player issues with them.  Africa has been cracked for me this year, I've scouted so many good to great newgen players there, and there is a lot of existing talent there as well, you just have to load the continernt as part of the database to scout/sign them.

    Diagne is a very nice signing!

  13. 21 hours ago, BethFM said:

    Thank you 😊

    How have you been getting on?

    The squad looks pretty decent but I feel like promotion has to be achieved in the first season or most will want to leave.

    I got promoted 1st season, finished midtable the next season.  Fighting for an outside chance at 6th/7th place now. 

    My issue is I bring in good players on the cheap, they have a great season and leave for a bigger team, or I bring in a loan player with an optional fee I can't afford.
    We will get there though. 

    Youth Intakes like this don't hurt either:
    image.thumb.png.4461c8ad6046d2cd6feb3874eddaedb2.png

     

    I am liking it though, my first ever FM save was with USL Dunkerque back in FM17, I like playing inf France, beating PSG (eventually) is always fun...

    Jellico

     

  14. Schedule, Injuries, next opponent, player stats, League Table, budget, training for the week you are in.

    If the League table, which I would want to make the biggest one, also had the option to display Team Performance graphs, competitions, and contracts, I'd be OK with that.

    Something like this:

    image.png.db0718692c602cd34de2bcb6cbd2fe00.png

     

  15. 3 minutes ago, GIMN said:

    On a Mustermann front, I am stripping it back a bit - I don't think I'm ever going to be truly happy with whatever I settle on.

    From a more genereal standpoint, do you find yourself actively navigating to the Home Page?  Do you switch between widgets, or set them up once and stick to them (until the game decides to reset some panels)?

    Usually I set them up and leave them, but there are times when I want to look at something and instead of navigating to the page and then the tab it's easier to hit the widget.  I use the home page a lot actually.  

×
×
  • Create New...