Bigwig Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 24 minutes ago, Rafalution said: Do you think commentators who go in a separate entrance at football grounds are queue jumping because they're going to watch the same match as the fans? Have you not watched the advert with Roy Keane? They clearly go through the turnstiles. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coulthard's Jaw Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 13 minutes ago, Bigwig said: Have you not watched the advert with Roy Keane? They clearly go through the turnstiles. That's because it's only live, once. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_fenton Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 I expect every Sky presenter to have to queue through the turnstiles next match then instead of being given a fancy "press entrance" then. Perhaps war correspondents should have to enlist first as well? What a fuss over nothing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 42 minutes ago, Barry Cartman said: Except fast pass here is just privilege and wealth, and not available to everyone Most of America can't afford a fast pass. There's no difference. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oche balboa Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 Looks like the lads who carried the coffin will be honoured with MBE's Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ72 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 53 minutes ago, Rafalution said: Was it not part of their job given they were reporting on the funeral? Isn't that why they were given access to the press queue? Or to go back to the football match analogy, if they were given press seats so they could talk about their experience the next day on this morning, would that still be queue jumping? I've not got a clue what they were actually doing. But they didn't need to see a stiff in a box to report on the funeral? That's like the commentator getting on the match bus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadsheep2001 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 The only question here is whether they were doing as part of their job. If so, don't see the issue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ72 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 2 minutes ago, themadsheep2001 said: The only question here is whether they were doing as part of their job. If so, don't see the issue. Not sure how going to see the coffin was part of their job though? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_jagster Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 I was talking about this with my family, apparently they did do a feature for This Morning. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf_pd Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 34 minutes ago, oche balboa said: Looks like the lads who carried the coffin will be honoured with MBE's It's a lead coffin, must have been heavy. So wel deserved. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Golden boy Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 1 hour ago, Bigwig said: Willoughby seems to be the one taking most of the flak. Could be because she’s a woman but also could be because Schofield has kept his mouth shut while she keeps digging a deeper hole trying to defend herself. Phil was taking pelters last week tbf 1 hour ago, Barry Cartman said: Surely the commentators in this scenario are those broadcasting it live on BBC News, not some random ITV morning show. If there was a 13 hour wait to get into Wembley for the World Cup Final and Phil and Holly got to walk past the crowd and into the stadium to take their seats, then yes i'd say they were queuing jumping, despite no one else behind them losing out because it was a different line I'm not even arsed about this, but your example is just weak They'd be in the VIP section and enter the stadium through a VIP entrance. That's not queue jumping but being given a privilege because of who they are. It's the same in this instance whether people believe they should get that privilege is what's up for debate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadsheep2001 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 8 minutes ago, JJ72 said: Not sure how going to see the coffin was part of their job though? Entirely depends on what they were doing Given what Jags said: 5 minutes ago, The_jagster said: I was talking about this with my family, apparently they did do a feature for This Morning. That would be entirely in keeping with work. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Lucas Posted September 21, 2022 Administrators Share Posted September 21, 2022 Must end with Holly and or Phil leaving the show, it's pretty ridiculous the hole they are digging and it's not reflecting well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 "We were offered priority access so we took it. You all are ****ing mental spending 12 hours queueing for this. Get ****ed". Possibly why I don't have that kind of job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Cartman Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 I wouldn't mind them saying it's not queue jumping if the argument wasn't those in line were stood a few feet away on a carpet so it doesn't matter Just stick to the story of it being for work purposes, no need to debate the queue jumping bit 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ackter Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 It's not queue jumping. It's queue skipping. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ72 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 43 minutes ago, themadsheep2001 said: Entirely depends on what they were doing Given what Jags said: That would be entirely in keeping with work. Yes, maybe. Still not convinced that they needed to actually visit the coffin to do a feature on it - I could have just watched the feed and talked about it. Or get someone in who'd queued up to talk about it. Waste of time doing a feature on it anyway but that's another matter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confused Clarity Posted September 21, 2022 Author Share Posted September 21, 2022 2 hours ago, oche balboa said: You have answered your own Question. Plus i think people are disappointed in her. Schofield is a piece of work regardless What is it specifically that makes Schofield a piece of work in your eyes? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confused Clarity Posted September 21, 2022 Author Share Posted September 21, 2022 When it was originally being reported, I thought that they'd actually queued up to go along in procession like everybody else. If they've been given access to the platform that was used by MPs, foreign dignitaries and the press, then I can understand it tbh. I didn't see the This Morning piece, because I don't watch the show, but if they were doing a piece on the people who queued and what happened, then I could see why it would be reasonable for them to have experienced it and to have been on that platform. In doing so, they'd not just have observed the Queen lying in state, but they'd have observed the public too, which would give them the ability to discuss the public's response to it all. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadsheep2001 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 25 minutes ago, JJ72 said: Yes, maybe. Still not convinced that they needed to actually visit the coffin to do a feature on it - I could have just watched the feed and talked about it. Or get someone in who'd queued up to talk about it. Waste of time doing a feature on it anyway but that's another matter That would be a poor way to do an exclusive feature, since everyone has access to that and very few producers would do that if they could get nearby access to the coffin. No idea if their work excuse is true but if you were going to create a feature that's how you'd do it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
samuelawachie Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 Wait guys! Are you actually saying that that photo that someone posted of Phil on a hoverboard jumping the queue was actually real? I thought it was a good attempt at humor... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JJ72 Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 Might be a few more royals having funerals soon... https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-62982315 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gricehead Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 3 hours ago, Ackter said: If I had the money I'd send all these people to Disney world just to hear them explode when they learn what a fast pass is. Or isn't, considering fastpass was scrapped by Disney last year. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartwork Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 1 hour ago, Confused Clarity said: What is it specifically that makes Schofield a piece of work in your eyes? I understand why people on the left don't like him but no idea what oche had against him Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartwork Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 2 hours ago, Lucas said: Must end with Holly and or Phil leaving the show, it's pretty ridiculous the hole they are digging and it's not reflecting well. Stupid thing is if they had simply apologised at the start, explained they were offered it and didn't consider how it would look to others and promised to take into account how their actions could be perceived in future, this wouldn't have got so out of hand. But royalists in particular seem incensed about it and every time they open their mouths they dig themselves into a deeper hole. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oche balboa Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 13 hours ago, Heartwork said: I understand why people on the left don't like him but no idea what oche had against him To answer your questions. I know a few people who have worked in the TV industry and they all say he's the type of person who treats people like they are something off his shoe, Like Richard Keys. I never been a fan of his anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bigwig Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 8 minutes ago, oche balboa said: To answer your questions. I know a few people who have worked in the TV industry and they all say he's the type of person who treats people like they are something off his shoe, Like Richard Keys. I never been a fan of his anyway I’ve heard Gordon the Gopher’s autobiography is going to be explosive. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
oche balboa Posted September 22, 2022 Share Posted September 22, 2022 1 minute ago, Bigwig said: I’ve heard Gordon the Gopher’s autobiography is going to be explosive. LOL Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_fenton Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 Prepare for the Royal Decree to scrub your Sky boxes... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/25/uk-broadcasters-battle-monarchy-over-control-of-queens-memorial-footage Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartwork Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 Will say this has definitely delayed the Poppy Brigade by a few weeks. Would normally start seeing them by now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pompeyboyz Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 48 minutes ago, m_fenton said: Prepare for the Royal Decree to scrub your Sky boxes... https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/25/uk-broadcasters-battle-monarchy-over-control-of-queens-memorial-footage And we scoffed at those people recording the procession 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coulthard's Jaw Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 So many will have recordings already backed up digitally or on disc Will never leave Youtube. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Golden boy Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 Seems like a bit of a slap in the face to the media companies who dedicated so much of their resources into covering the period. Would hope it discourages them from dedicating so much time and effort in future. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weezer Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 All that expensive pomp and ceremony and now they want it erased from the records?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_fenton Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 15 minutes ago, Weezer said: All that expensive pomp and ceremony and now they want it erased from the records?! Aside from anything else, those events aren't just symbolic. They're public records of the changing of the Head of State, who still signs off on legislation etc. It's like the government ordering that recordings of Parliament get deleted, or vetoing what the public see from them. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darren Moores Mum Posted September 25, 2022 Share Posted September 25, 2022 The pricks are happy to be given their life of luxury because of the public so they should go **** themselves. 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadsheep2001 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 Thing is, there's no way to police this either. I suspect any good archivist will be hiding all of this stuff carefully in a vault 1 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony85 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 Aren't some of you suggesting something that isn't actually happening? The footage won't be deleted. It will still exist and won't have to be hidden away secretly. But you will have to ask permission to use any of the additional material which wasn't inside the original hour you had submitted to the Royal household. Not that it makes it much better but it's not quite the same thing as implied above. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wolf_pd Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 What about foreign broadcasters, have they been asked to cleanse their stuff? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
m_fenton Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 55 minutes ago, Tony85 said: Aren't some of you suggesting something that isn't actually happening? The footage won't be deleted. It will still exist and won't have to be hidden away secretly. But you will have to ask permission to use any of the additional material which wasn't inside the original hour you had submitted to the Royal household. Not that it makes it much better but it's not quite the same thing as implied above. They'll only retain an hour of it, so yes the rest will be deleted. Otherwise they'd be retaining more than an hour of it. A copy might exist with the royal family, but so far as the public are concerned it's deleted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafalution Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 Nothing in that article suggests that they will have to delete the rest - in fact the ability to request the inclusion of footage outside the 60minutes suggests they will indeed be able to archive the rest. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themadsheep2001 Posted September 26, 2022 Share Posted September 26, 2022 No archivist worth their salt would delete it anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confused Clarity Posted September 27, 2022 Author Share Posted September 27, 2022 New Royal cypher revealed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barry Cartman Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 Ronaldo going to sue over the use of CR3 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD nawrat Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 On 21/09/2022 at 17:40, Confused Clarity said: What is it specifically that makes Schofield a piece of work in your eyes? Didn't he groom a 17 year old for years and when it became public knowledge, announced that he was gay, which conveniently meant the nation forgot he was grooming teenagers as an almost-60 year old man? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Confused Clarity Posted September 27, 2022 Author Share Posted September 27, 2022 That seems like a fairly slanderous comment that you'd better be prepared to back up . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JD nawrat Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 2 minutes ago, Confused Clarity said: That seems like a fairly slanderous comment that you'd better be prepared to back up . I'm just asking a question. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
decapitated Posted September 27, 2022 Share Posted September 27, 2022 Just now, JD nawrat said: I'm just asking a question. It's still slanderous/libellous to ask it! If you've no actual proof then you have to be careful as such slurs against LGBT celebrities are sadly not unknown. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Lucas Posted September 27, 2022 Administrators Share Posted September 27, 2022 1 minute ago, Confused Clarity said: That seems like a fairly slanderous comment that you'd better be prepared to back up . It's a question, not a comment. Not really fairly slanderous when you consider what the public discourse was with the circumstances and details were at the time. Definitely not slanderous to ask questions. 3 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Administrators Lucas Posted September 27, 2022 Administrators Share Posted September 27, 2022 2 minutes ago, decapitated said: It's still slanderous/libellous to ask it! If you've no actual proof then you have to be careful as such slurs against LGBT celebrities are sadly not unknown. You're right, but unfortunately it's come from somewhere, it's a bit unfair to assume and part blame on @JD nawrat tbh Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts