Jump to content

Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II passes away. 21st April 1926 - 8th September 2022.


Confused Clarity
 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 3.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

28 minutes ago, Bigwig said:

Not sure what exactly she’s spoken to lawyers about. It doesn’t seem that she’s likely to be sacked and I don’t recall any newspapers or media outlets making libellous or slanderous comments so unless she’s planning on suing the thousands of people having a pop on twitter I don’t see what legal advice she’s seeking. 

Probably just a pr headline. 

If half the people who read it think "ah if she's taking legal advice it must mean what i thought was wrong" and they forgot about it then job done

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Coulthard's Jaw said:

This all feels very dumb. Do think having This ****ing Morning barging in and broadcasting from there is a bit much though.

Phil and Holly taking all this flack whilst MPs did the same and were allowed to bring 4 guests with them 

Link to post
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Bigwig said:

Not sure what exactly she’s spoken to lawyers about. It doesn’t seem that she’s likely to be sacked and I don’t recall any newspapers or media outlets making libellous or slanderous comments so unless she’s planning on suing the thousands of people having a pop on twitter I don’t see what legal advice she’s seeking. 

There's a massive online petition to get This Morning cancelled because of it :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Barry Cartman said:

Not sure she understands how queue jumping works, not taking someones place in the queue is exactly what it is :D 

She's saying that the queue she was part of had no affect on the normal queue because both were at the same time. People weren't stopped from looking just so she could nip in, she was looking at the same time as people just from a different place.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Barry Cartman said:

Phil and Holly taking all this flack whilst MPs did the same and were allowed to bring 4 guests with them 

But people have no idea what most MPs look like.

The statements are stupid though, it's not the idea that people were having to wait another 30 seconds that has got them annoyed, but that one group has a 13 hour wait and another flash a pass.

Focus on the bringing it to the attention of the public via their programme angle, not the semantics

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Barry Cartman said:

Not sure she understands how queue jumping works, not taking someones place in the queue is exactly what it is :D 

Queue jumping generally means going straight to the front and therefore pushing everyone back in the queue one. What they were doing was separate  to what those who were queuing for were doing, so they weren't jumping that queue

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Bigwig said:

Willoughby seems to be the one taking most of the flak. Could be because she’s a woman but also could be because Schofield has kept his mouth shut while she keeps digging a deeper hole trying to defend herself. 

I think Phil is getting away with it mainly because he doesn't even look at the coffin and just walks past, so its easier to accept, whereas Holly takes the time to take a look which is what people have queued 13 hours for 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Bigwig said:

Willoughby seems to be the one taking most of the flak. Could be because she’s a woman but also could be because Schofield has kept his mouth shut while she keeps digging a deeper hole trying to defend herself. 

You have answered your own Question. Plus i think people are disappointed in her. Schofield is a piece of work regardless 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Rafalution said:

Queue jumping generally means going straight to the front and therefore pushing everyone back in the queue one. What they were doing was separate  to what those who were queuing for were doing, so they weren't jumping that queue

Surely it depends on what you're queuing for? This wasn't a queue to buy tickets and therefore they've taken someones place meaning someone else has missed out, this was a queue to walk past something and take a look at something, which she walked to the front of the queue and did. Where people were stood seems like a very thin argument 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rafalution said:

Do you think commentators who go in a separate entrance at football grounds are queue jumping because they're going to watch the same match as the fans? 

Surely the commentators in this scenario are those broadcasting it live on BBC News, not some random ITV morning show. If there was a 13 hour wait to get into Wembley for the World Cup Final and Phil and Holly got to walk past the crowd and into the stadium to take their seats, then yes i'd say they were queuing jumping, despite no one else behind them losing out because it was a different line

I'm not even arsed about this, but your example is just weak  

Link to post
Share on other sites

Was it not part of their job given they were reporting on the funeral? Isn't that why they were given access to the press queue?  

Or to go back to the football match analogy, if they were given press seats so they could talk about their experience the next day on this morning, would that still be queue jumping? 

Edited by Rafalution
Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Rafalution said:

Do you think commentators who go in a separate entrance at football grounds are queue jumping because they're going to watch the same match as the fans? 

Have you not watched the advert with Roy Keane?  They clearly go through the turnstiles. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Rafalution said:

Was it not part of their job given they were reporting on the funeral? Isn't that why they were given access to the press queue?  

Or to go back to the football match analogy, if they were given press seats so they could talk about their experience the next day on this morning, would that still be queue jumping? 

I've not got a clue what they were actually doing. But they didn't need to see a stiff in a box to report on the funeral? That's like the commentator getting on the match bus

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Bigwig said:

Willoughby seems to be the one taking most of the flak. Could be because she’s a woman but also could be because Schofield has kept his mouth shut while she keeps digging a deeper hole trying to defend herself. 

Phil was taking pelters last week tbf

1 hour ago, Barry Cartman said:

Surely the commentators in this scenario are those broadcasting it live on BBC News, not some random ITV morning show. If there was a 13 hour wait to get into Wembley for the World Cup Final and Phil and Holly got to walk past the crowd and into the stadium to take their seats, then yes i'd say they were queuing jumping, despite no one else behind them losing out because it was a different line

I'm not even arsed about this, but your example is just weak  

They'd be in the VIP section and enter the stadium through a VIP entrance. That's not queue jumping but being given a privilege because of who they are. It's the same in this instance whether people believe they should get that privilege is what's up for debate. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, JJ72 said:

Not sure how going to see the coffin was part of their job though?

Entirely depends on what they were doing

Given what Jags said:

5 minutes ago, The_jagster said:

I was talking about this with my family, apparently they did do a feature for This Morning.

That would be entirely in keeping with work. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, themadsheep2001 said:

Entirely depends on what they were doing

Given what Jags said:

That would be entirely in keeping with work. 

Yes, maybe. Still not convinced that they needed to actually visit the coffin to do a feature on it - I could have just watched the feed and talked about it. Or get someone in who'd queued up to talk about it.

Waste of time doing a feature on it anyway but that's another matter :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

When it was originally being reported, I thought that they'd actually queued up to go along in procession like everybody else.

If they've been given access to the platform that was used by MPs, foreign dignitaries and the press, then I can understand it tbh.

I didn't see the This Morning piece, because I don't watch the show, but if they were doing a piece on the people who queued and what happened, then I could see why it would be reasonable for them to have experienced it and to have been on that platform.

In doing so, they'd not just have observed the Queen lying in state, but they'd have observed the public too, which would give them the ability to discuss the public's response to it all.

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, JJ72 said:

Yes, maybe. Still not convinced that they needed to actually visit the coffin to do a feature on it - I could have just watched the feed and talked about it. Or get someone in who'd queued up to talk about it.

Waste of time doing a feature on it anyway but that's another matter :D

That would be a poor way to do an exclusive feature, since everyone has access to that and very few producers would do that if they could get nearby access to the coffin. 

No idea if their work excuse is true but if you were going to create a feature that's how you'd do it. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Lucas said:

Must end with Holly and or Phil leaving the show, it's pretty ridiculous the hole they are digging and it's not reflecting well.

Stupid thing is if they had simply apologised at the start, explained they were offered it and didn't consider how it would look to others and promised to take into account how their actions could be perceived in future, this wouldn't have got so out of hand. But royalists in particular seem incensed about it and every time they open their mouths they dig themselves into a deeper hole.

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Heartwork said:

I understand why people on the left don't like him but no idea what oche had against him

To answer your questions. I know a few people who have worked in the TV industry and they all say he's the type of person who treats people like they are something off his shoe, Like Richard Keys. I never been a fan of his anyway 

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, oche balboa said:

To answer your questions. I know a few people who have worked in the TV industry and they all say he's the type of person who treats people like they are something off his shoe, Like Richard Keys. I never been a fan of his anyway 

I’ve heard Gordon the Gopher’s autobiography is going to be explosive. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, m_fenton said:

And we scoffed at those people recording the procession :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...