Jump to content

Michael Sant

SI Staff
  • Posts

    4,124
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Michael Sant

  1. Thanks for mentioning this one to us. Would you be able to provide us with your save game file where you're at the point of one of these negotiations where the AI accepts this kind of buy back clause? This would enable the QA team investigating further.
  2. Thanks for sharing this with us. In the example you've given it would be good to see what has already taken place and what subsequent negotiations yield. There's no guarantee we would be able to get it to reproduce on our side. If you can share your save game it will make it a lot more efficient for our QA team to investigate. A guide on uploading your save is available here:
  3. Thanks for bringing this one to our attention, the QA team will investigate further. Have you been able to get this happen with any other players at all?
  4. It's something we will keep an eye on. Thanks for providing the additional information.
  5. Sorry to hear that this has happened. If you go to save game as are you able to save it under a fresh file name, or in another folder and have that work?
  6. As mentioned by Daniel, at lower ends its an issue we're aware of and looking into. There has been a look into the original scenario though, and its definitely a big jump but its not something we would see too much of an issue with. Keep in mind there are a lot of gameplay mechanics through which you can establish an interest in a player and lay the groundwork for much more favourable negotiations. For example: - Declare interest in player - Begin negotiations with the club, lower range valuations with non-negotiable bids to see if you can unsettle the player - Reaching out to the agent to understand the players demands - Player interactions to promote club to target
  7. Thanks for taking the time to post this, but its not a bug but rather something set by our research team. Transfer budgets aren't indicative of a clubs remaining balance. We have to estimate the amounts we feel a club would be looking to offer on transfers, and while a club might sanction a high value move for a specific individual that is more a board level decision (like asking the board to sign a specific player) rather than it being indicative of funds available for general squad building. A comparison with Man City is irrelevant from a research perspective, the Chelsea researcher would have no interest in what Man City have their budget set at when deciding what they feel Chelsea would sanction spending. For Premier League data issues you can post in this thread:
  8. Thank you for providing these, the QA team will investigate further.
  9. Thanks for letting us know that is working for you as well. Our QA team will still do the necessary checks on our side about this.
  10. Sounding out agents allows you to get a better understanding of what a players expectations would be. However, it is simply the reality that there are times when you'll look to begin discussions with a player and you're just too far apart or you make too many missteps that the agent is no longer willing to negotiate with you. If you walk away you wouldn't be able to negotiate a contract because you've walked away from discussions.
  11. There's a lot of subjectivity in this area, I can see your point on one hand but an agent of a certain mindset and perhaps reluctance on some part of the player given you're not an established PL side may result in the players demands being higher. It's something worth getting checked out a bit further if we can, do you have a save game available still from before the point you entered contract negotiations? This would allow the QA team to investigate further. A guide on sharing your save file is available here:
  12. If you have a save game showing this it would be great to see it, this would enable QA to investigate further. A guide on uploading your file is available here: https://community.sigames.com/bugtracker/instructions-and-notes/how-to-upload-files-to-us-r98/
  13. Thanks for sharing these with us. On your finances page does it show any kind of estimations of the range you'd be able to offer? With a more restrained budget and needing to fill a whole squad it could make a bit more sense you'd be limited to around 5% of your wage bill on a star player. The QA team will take a look into this further though.
  14. Not a problem, if its different in any other competitions let us know.
  15. Do you happen to have a save game available from before this happening? I think its an issue our QA team are aware of but having more examples would always be beneficial. A guide on how to upload your save is available here:
  16. It's a bit strange to see a sacking after 2 days, but the caretaker position isn't unusual. Would you be able to share your save game with us so the QA team can take a look into this further? A guide on how to share your save file is available here:
  17. Many thanks for taking the time to share this one with us. The QA team will take a look into this further.
  18. Thanks for taking the time to share this one. Our QA team will take a look into this a bit further.
  19. Thanks for coming back and providing that screenshot & save. The QA team will investigate further.
  20. Thank you for raising this one to us. It could be a data issue - do you have some screenshots which show Dubravka being deployed as first choice keeper?
  21. Thanks for pointing out this issue to us, would you be able to share your save game in which this is happening? A guide on how to share your save is available here:
  22. I've had a little check on mine and couldn't get this to happen. Would you be able to share your save game with us in which this is happening? A guide on how to upload your save is available here:
  23. Thanks for letting us know about this issue and bringing it to our attention. Do either of you happen to have a screenshot of this you can share, just so our QA team can see exactly what is happening on your side.
  24. Thanks for providing some further information on this one. Our QA team are investigating this but knowing a bit more about what has happened for you definitely helps.
  25. As odemill mentions, you can only make your subs across three stoppages. So if you do 1 in the 60th, 1 in the 65th and 1 in the 70th you can't make any more. You can use up to 5 across 3 stoppages in the game. If you do encounter any issues when trying to do it this way please do let us know.
×
×
  • Create New...